Keywords: truth, humanities, post-truth, existentialism, postmodernism, constructivism, emancipation
Contemporary humanities are increasingly criticized for their abandonment of rigorous scientific methods and their indifference, if not hostility, to the issue of truth. Particularly postmodernism is accused of being directly responsible for the emergence of the post-truth era in the academic and cultural field. Such critiques have been recently appropriated by conservative thinkers and the far-right, who turn them into political attacks against liberal values.
The article aims at identifying and analyzing those features of the contemporary humanities which risk to offer theoretical support to the practical attitudes characteristic of our post-truth era. I suggest some ideas for a revision of those features, arguing at the same time against conservative attacks on the humanities.
The article starts by comparing some fundamental moments in the development of the discourse on truth within the post-Nietzschean philosophy of the 20th century. The propositional and the phenomenological-existentialist conceptions of truth elaborated in the first half of the century are used as background to understand the impact of the “linguistic turn” on the humanities since the 1960s, with particular attention to the constructivist paradigm which grew out of the “linguistic turn” and continues to dominate the humanities today. Constructivism is the main object of conservative critiques of the humanities, though what conservatives really target through constructivism is the discourse of emancipation, which have linked the work of scholars in the humanities with the struggles of minorities and marginalized groups in society.
The article rejects conservative critiques and affirms the necessity to develop the emancipatory potential of the humanities after the “linguistic turn”. This presupposes a renewed attention to the issue of truth, which would avoid a return to pre-Nietzschean, metaphysical or positivist approaches, looking for theoretical support rather in the 20th-century propositional and existential understandings of truth. The article takes issues from this point of view with three aspects of the contemporary humanities which are becoming more and more problematic in our post-truth era: ‘postmodernist relativism’, ‘hermeneutics of suspicion’, ‘discursive imprisonment’. Rehabilitating facts, questioning the legitimacy of interpretations, reinstating agency, freedom and responsibility are the strategic moves suggested in the article to equip the humanities with the tools for critically facing the theoretical and practical challenges of the post-truth era and adequately respond to conservative attacks.
Daniele Monticelli (b. 1970), PhD, Tallinn University, School of Humanities, Professor of Italian Studies and Semiotics (Narva mnt 25, 10120 Tallinn), daniele.monticelli@tlu.ee
References
Aquino Thomas 2014 [1265–1274]. La somma teologica. Testo latino a fronte. Kd 1. Bologna: Edizioni Studio Domenicano.
Austin, John Langshaw 2018 [1962]. Kuidas teha sõnadega asju. (Bibliotheca philosophica.) Tlk Triin Kallas. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Carnap, Rudolf 2003 [1932]. Metafüüsika ületamine keele loogilise analüüsiga. Tlk Bruno Mölder. – Akadeemia, nr 9, lk 1853–1875.
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2001. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dennett, Daniel 2013. Dennett on Wieseltier V. Pinker in The New Republic. Let’s Start With a Respect for Truth. https://www.edge.org/conversation/dennett-on-wieseltier-v-pinker-in-the-new-republic (17. V 2019).
Dennett, Daniel 2017. Daniel Dennett: I begrudge every hour I have to spend worrying about politics. – The Guardian 12. II.
Derrida, Jacques 1997 [1967]. Of Grammatology. Baltimore–London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eco, Umberto 1990. The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Eco, Umberto 1992. Interpretation and Overinterpretation: World, History, Texts. (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eco, Umberto 2005 [1983]. Lector in fabula. Tlk Ülar Ploom. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Eco, Umberto 2014 [1988]. Foucault’ pendel. Tlk Mailis Põld. Tallinn: Varrak.
Eco, Umberto 2016 [1990]. I limiti dell’interpretazione. Milano: La nave di Teseo.
Eco, Umberto 2017 [2015]. Olematu number. Tlk Eva Kolli. Tallinn: Varrak.
Foucault, Michel 2005 [1970]. Diskursuse kord. Collège de France’i inauguratsiooniloeng 2. detsembril 1970. Tallinn: Varrak.
Frege, Gottlob 1879. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Verlag von Louis Nebert.
Frege, Gottlob 1999 [1892]. Tähendusest ja osutusest. – Tähendus. Tõde. Meetod. Tekste analüütilisest filosoofiast. Toim Jaan Kangilaski, Margo Laasberg. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 22–43.
Hall, Stuart 1997. Where is the subject? – Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Toim Stuart Hall. Milton Keynes: Open University, lk 31–56.
Heidegger, Martin 1955. Vom Wesen des Grundes. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, Martin 1997. Vom Wesen der Warheit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, Martin 2001 [1927]. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Kõuts, Ragne 2018. Sotsiaalse reaalsuse konstrueerimine 2.0. – Sirp 6. VII.
Lotman, Juri 2007. Hirm ja segadus. Esseid kultuurisemiootikast. (Ajalugu. Sotsiaalteadused.) Tlk Kajar Pruul. Tallinn: Varrak.
Madisson, Mari-Liis 2016. The Semiotic Construction of Identities in Hypermedia Environments: The Analysis of Online Communication of the Estonian Extreme Right. (Dissertationes semioticae Universitatis Tartuensis 23.) Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Marchart, Oliver 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought. Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624973.001.0001
McIntyre, Lee 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001
Monticelli, Daniele 2016. Poliitika tühisus ja tühjusest võrsuv poliitika. – Vikerkaar, nr 1–2, lk 128–148.
Monticelli, Daniele 2018. Kollektiivne identiteet teooria ja poliitika vahel. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 10, lk 799–804.
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1973 [1883]. Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. Chemnitz: Verlag von Ernst Schmeitzner.
Nietzsche, Friedrich 2008. Nõnda kõneles Zarathustra. Raamat kõigile ja eikellelegi. Tlk Johannes Palla. Tallinn: Olion.
Pajula, Hardo 2018. Universitas’e lahkumine. – Postimees 16. VI.
Peterson, Jordan 2018. 12 Rules for Life. An Antidote to Chaos. New York: Penguin Random House.
Piirimäe, Eva 2008. Keeleline pööre. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 8–9, lk 589–603.
Pinker, Steven 2013. Science is not Your Enemy. – The New Republic 7. VIII.
Pinker, Steven, Wieseltier, Leon 2013. Science vs. the Humanities, Round III. – The New Republic 27. IX.
Ricoeur, Paul 1965. De l’interprétation. Essai sur Sigmund Freud. Paris: Seuil.
Raud, Rein 2018. Sotsiaalsed konstruktsioonid ja poliitiline tegelikkus. – Postimees 28. IV.
Robinson, Douglas 2014. Performative Linguistics: Speaking and Translating as Doing Things with Words. London–New York: Routledge.
Rorty, Richard 1999. Sattumuslikkus, iroonia, solidaarsus. Tlk Märt Väljataga. Tallinn: Vagabund.
Russell, Bertrand, Whitehead, Alfred North 1910–1913. Principia Mathematica. Kd 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2004. Eksistentsialism on humanism. Tlk Vivian Bohl. – Vikerkaar, nr 10–11, lk 84–106.
Shore, Marci 2017. A pre-history of post-truth, East and West. – Eurozine, 1. IX. https://www.eurozine.com/a-pre-history-of-post-truth-east-and-west/ (17. VII 2019).
Tarski, Alfred 1999 [1933]. Semantiline tõekontseptsioon ja semantika alused. – Tähendus. Tõde. Meetod. Tekste analüütilisest filosoofiast. Toim Jaan Kangilaski, Margo Laasberg. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 143–183.
Tugendhat, Ernst 1996. „Heideggers Idee von Wahrheit”. Wahrheitstheorien: eine Auswhal aus den Diskussionen über Wahrheit im 20. Jahrhundert. Toim Gunnar Skirbekk. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, lk 431–448.
Vahtre, Lauri 2018a. Sotsiaalkonstruktivism ja hall udu. – Postimees 4. V.
Vahtre, Lauri 2018b. Toksiline mood ja raudne diagnostika. – Postimees 5. VI.
White, Hayden 1973. Interpretation in history. – New Literary History, On Interpretation II, kd 4, nr 2, lk 281–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/468478
Wieseltier, Leon 2013. No, science doesn’t have all the answers. – The New Republic 7. VIII.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1996 [1921]. Loogilis-filosoofiline traktaat. Tlk Jaan Kangilaski. Tartu: Ilmamaa.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 2005 [1953]. Filosoofilised uurimused. Tlk Andres Luure. Tartu: Ilmamaa.
