Situated knowledge in the post-truth era


Keywords: discourse analysis, post-truth, post-critique, postmodernism

Postmodernism and situated truths have been named among the creators of the post-truth world in both academic texts and mainstream media. Discourse studies is one of the disciplines associated with situated truths. That label covers, on the one hand, theoretical analyses inspired by the work of Michel Foucault and, on the other hand, the subfield of linguistics that studies contexualised language use. While critics habitually target discourse theory, the present think piece asks whether we could use empirically grounded discourse analysis to study the post-truth condition. The focus is on Johannes Angermüller’s programme of discourse studies, inspired by science and technology studies. For Angermüller, discourse is a situated practice in which members of discourse communities linguistically construct and deconstruct truths. Instead of trying to identify a truth that is not influenced by society he proposes a reflexive study of competing truths. This far critical discourse analysis has sought to unmask truths it considers false. Angermüller believes that we should use the same theoretical and methodological tools to study what we consider true and false. The soft relativism of his approach accepts epistemic relativism, according to which discourses grow out of a specific context, but not the belief that all discourses offer an equally valid representation of reality, as each context possesses criteria for distinguishing facts and opinions. Angermüller’s programme is one solution for using the empirical potential of discourse analysis for the study of the post-truth world.

Raili Marling (b. 1973), PhD, University of Tartu, Professor at the Department of English Studies (Lossi 3, 51003 Tartu), raili.marling@ut.ee


Angermüller, Johannes 2015. Why There Is No Poststructuralism in France. The Making of an Intellectual Generation. London: Bloomsbury.

Angermüller, Johannes 2018a. Truth after post-truth: For a strong programme in discourse studies. – Palgrave Communications, kd 4, nr 30, lk 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0080-1

Angermüller, Johannes 2018b. Accumulating discursive capital, valuating subject positions. From Marx to Foucault. – Critical Discourse Studies, kd 15, nr 4, lk 414–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1457551

Anker, Elizabeth S., Felski, Rita (toim) 2017. Critique and Postcritique. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373049

Baggini, Julian 2017. A Short History of Truth. London: Quercus.

Block, David 2019. Post Truth and Political Discourse. Cham: Palgrave Mac­millan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00497-2

Bloor, David 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brown, Wendy 2015. Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8

Brown, Gillian, Y u l e, George 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Derrida, Jacques 1997. Sokal et Bricmont ne sont pas sérieux. – Le Monde 20. XI.

Fairclough, Norman 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, Norman 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge–Malden: Polity Press.

Fairclough, Norman 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Fairclough, Norman, Chouliaraki, Lilie 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Foucault, Michel 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Tlk A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, Michel 2010 The Government of Self and Others. Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983. Tlk Graham Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274730

Foucault, Michel 2011. The Courage of Truth. Lectures at the Collège de France 1983–1984. Tlk Graham Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Harris, Zellig S. 1952. Discourse analysis. – Language, kd 28, nr 1, lk 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/409987

Hutcheon, Linda 2002. The Politics of Postmodernism. 2nd edition. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203129876

Jameson, Fredric 1988. Cognitive mapping. – Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Toim Cary Nelson, Lawrence Grossberg. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, lk 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_25

Jørgensen, Marianne W., Phillips, Louise J. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871

Kakutani, Michiko 2019. The Death of Truth. Notes on Falsehood in the Age of Trump. New York: Random House.

Käsper, Marge, Marling, Raili 2018. Diskursuseanalüüsi muutuv suhe kvanti­fitseerimisega inglis- ja prantsuskeelses traditsioonis. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 8–9, lk 728−746. https://doi.org/10.54013/kk730a8

Latour, Bruno 1997. Y a-t-il une science après la Guerre Froide? – Le Monde 18. I.

Latour, Bruno 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. – Critical Inquiry, nr 30, lk 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123

Lyotard, Jean-François 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Know­legde. Tlk Geoff Bennington, Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278

Maingueneau, Dominique 2001. Archéologie et analyse du discours. – Sociologie du travail, kd 7, nr 5. – http://www.revue-texto.net/Reperes/Themes/Maingueneau_Archeologie.html

Mills, Sara 2004. Discourse. London–New York: Routledge.

Montgomery, Martin 2017. Post-truth politics? Authenticity, populism and the electoral discourses of Donald Trump. – Journal of Language and Politics, kd 16, nr 4, lk 619–639. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17023.mon

Oreskes, Naomi, Conway, Erik M. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

Piirimäe, Eva 2008. Keeleline pööre. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 8–9, lk 589–603.

Pinker, Steven 2018. Enlightenment Now. The Case for Reason, Science, Human­ism, and Progress. New York: Penguin.

Proctor, Robert N. 1995. Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don’t Know About Cancer. New York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7010.959

Prozorov, Sergei 2019. Why is there truth? Foucault in the age of post-truth politics. – Constellations, kd 26, nr 1, lk 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12396

Rheindorf, Markus 2019. Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies. New Trajectories in Methodology, Open Data and Visualization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19369-0

Ricoeur, Paul 1977. Freud and Philosophy. Tlk Denis Savage. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Sokal, Alan, Bricmont, Jean 1998. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science. London: Profile Books.

van  Dijk, Teun A. 2005. Ideoloogia: multidistsiplinaarne käsitlus. Tlk Merit Karise. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Wodak, Ruth (toim) 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis. Kd 1: Concept, History, Theory. Sage: London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446286289