Construing the meaning of learning space in university: perceptions of students

https://doi.org/10.54013/kk754a6

Keywords: learning space, metaphors in learning, critical discourse analysis, construing of experiences, construing of perceptions

The aim of the article is to understand and describe the hidden meanings of learning space in the construing of learning space experience among learners in university. We also attempt to identify how to change the learning space so that it would support learning and teaching and promote the emergence of learning communities. Universities around the globe have been investing in the creation of contemporary learning spaces (Cox 2011) but the sole focus on new spatial solutions disguises the inability to be engaged in the content-related aspects of learning and teaching (Karvalho, Yeoman 2018). This neglects the experience of learning space in its wider meaning, which involves not only the physical aspects of a space or environment, but also how learning and teaching is done (see Saar et al. 2012) and how learners are talking about it. Analysis of texts, including the metaphors used by learners, allows us to understand how the learning space is construed in learners’ experience.

To achieve our aim, we focused on the course of forum theatre as a non-formal learning method. Based on the Freirean idea of dialogue and relationship between teacher and learner (Boal 1995, 1998), it brought out the learners’ language usage regarding learning space. The learners in the course filled in two written reflections, one at the beginning of the course, the other at the end. Two focus groups were carried out as well and the data collected was analysed with critical discourse analysis, including metaphors.

As a result, we can say that the learners found physical space marginal. Instead, it was creating and keeping the social space together with the relations in it that was valued most highly. The latter covers not only the relations among the learners themselves but also those between the lecturer and the learner, both being equal in a safe space. As learners themselves are willing to contribute in the creation of learning space, this should be seen as a resource to use in the everyday working life of lecturers.

 

Halliki Põlda (b. 1970), PhD, Tallinn University, School of Educational Sciences, Lecturer in Lifelong Learning (Narva mnt 25, 10120 Tallinn), halliki.polda@tlu.ee

Gertha Teidla-Kunitsõn (b. 1990), MA, Tallinn University, School of Educational Sciences, Visiting Lecturer, School of Governance, Law and Society, PhD Student and Junior Researcher (Narva mnt 25,10120 Tallinn), gertha.teidla-kunitson@tlu.ee

References

VEEBIVARAD

EKSS = Eesti keele seletav sõnaraamat 2009. www.eki.ee/dict/ekss

ETÜ = Eesti etümoloogiasõna­raamat 2012. Koost Iris Metsmägi, Meeli Sedrik, Sven-Erik Soosaar. https://www.eki.ee/dict/ety

Haridussõnastik. http://www.eki.ee/dict/haridus

OED = Online Etymology Dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com

 

KIRJANDUS

Aava, Katrin; Karu, Katrin; Kaal, Esta; Uusküla, Mari 2020. Õpi- või õpperuum? Mõistekasutus loob arusaama õppimise sisust. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 8-9, lk 704-718.
https://doi.org/10.54013/kk754a5
Abualrub, Iyad; Karseth, Berit; Stensaker, Bjørn 2013. The various understandings of learning environment in higher education and its quality implications. – Quality in Higher Education, kd 19, nr 1, lk 90-110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2013.772464
Arro, Grete 2017. Milline ruum soosib õppimist, milline lõõgastumist? – Õpetajate Leht 21. I.
Beckers, Roland; van der Voordt, Theo; Dewulf, Geert 2015. A conceptual framework to identify spatial implications of new ways of learning in higher education. – Facilities, kd 33, nr 1-2, lk 2-19.
https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0013
Beckers, Roland; van der Voordt, Theo; Dewulf, Geert 2016. Why do they study there? Diary research into students’ learning space choices in higher education. – Higher Education Research and Development, kd 35, nr 1, lk 142-157.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1123230
Boal, Augusto 1995. The Rainbow of Desires. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Boal, Augusto 1998. Legislative Theatre. New York: Routledge.
Burns, Mecca 2007. Theatre of the Oppressed. – Interactive and Improvisational Drama: Varieties of Applied Theatre and Performance. Toim Adam Blatner. Lincoln: iUniverse, lk 218-229.
Cameron, Lynn 2003. Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London-New York: Continuum.
Cox, Andrew M. 2011. Students’ experience of university space: An exploratory study. – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, kd 23, nr 2, lk 197-207.
Day, Kate 2009. Creating and sustaining effective learning environments. – All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, kd 1, nr 1. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/9 (12. I 2020).
Fairclough, Norman 2001. Language and Power. New York: Longman.
Fowler, Roger; Kress, Gunther 1979. Critical linguistics. – Language and Control. Toim R. Fowler, Robert Hodge, G. Kress, Tony Trew. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, lk 185-221.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436215-10
Freire, Paulo 1968. The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Giroux, Henry 2004. The Terror of Neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the Eclipse of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Hodge, Robert; Kress, Gunther 1993. Language as Ideology. London-New York: Routledge.
Hoffman, Jaimie; Blessinger, Patric; Mandla, Makhanya (toim) 2019. Strategies for Facilit­ating Inclusive Campuses in Higher Education: International Perspectives on Equity and Inclusion. (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning 17.) Bingley: ­Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-3641201917
Illeris, Knud 2007. How We Learn. Learning and Non-Learning in School and Beyond. ­Roskilde: Roskilde University Press; London-New York: Routledge.
Jasper, Melanie 2005. Using reflective writing within research. – Journal of Research in Nursing, kd 10, nr 3, lk 247-260.
https://doi.org/10.1177/174498710501000303
Jessop, Tansy; Gubby, Laura; Smith, Angela 2012. Space frontiers for new pedagogies: A tale of constraints and possibilities. – Studies in Higher Education, kd 37, nr 2, lk 189-202.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.503270
Kareva, Doris 2011. Rõhk on rõhututel. – Sirp 3. VI.
Karu, Katrin 2020. Üliõpilaste arusaamad õppimisest ülikoolis: andragoogiline vaade. (Tallinna Ülikooli sotsiaalteaduste dissertatsioonid 134.) Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Karu, Katrin; Jõgi, Larissa; Rannala, Ilona-Evelyn; Roosalu, Triin; Teder, Lianne; Põlda, ­Halliki 2019. Mitteformaalõppe tähenduse konstrueerimine poliitikadokumentides. – Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, kd 7, nr 1, lk 50-75.
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2019.7.1.03
Karvalho, Lucila; Yeoman, Pippa 2018. Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design and practice. – British Educational Research Journal, kd 44, nr 6, lk 1120-1137.
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3483
Kerge, Krista 2008. Vilunud keelekasutaja. C1-taseme eesti keele oskus. Tallinn: EKSA.
Kerge, Krista 2012. Let’s talk linguistics. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 8-9, lk 581-597.
https://doi.org/10.54013/kk658a3
Knowles, Malcolm S.; Holton III, Elwood F.; Swanson, Richard A. 2005. The Adult Learner. London: Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080481913
Kuurme, Tiiu 2015. Neoliberalismi mõjudest hariduses ja eriti kõrghariduses. – Eesti Rooma Klubi, 1. XI 2015. https://roomaklubi.com/2015/11/10/neoliberalismi-mojudest-hariduses-ja-eriti-korghariduses-t-kuurme/ (10. VII 2020).
Kuurme, Tiiu 2017. Kõrgharidust kiputakse taandama vaid majanduse teenriks. – Postimees 12. I.
Lachman, Sheldon Joseph 1997. Learning is a process: Toward an improved definition of learning. – The Journal of Psychology, kd 131, nr 5, lk 477-480.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989709603535
Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark 2011. Metafoorid, mille järgi me elame. Tlk Ene Vainik. (Gigantum humeris.) Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Liamputtong, Pranee 2011. Focus Group Methodology: Principle and Practice. London: Sage Publications.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957657
Lomas, Cyprien; Oblinger, Diana G. 2006. Student practices and their impact on learning spaces. – Learning Spaces. Toim D. Oblinger. Educause e-raamat, lk 5.1-5.11. https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7102.Pdf?fbclid=IwAR3nwpX_za25SFPDgU61JPdRUOwiKEhS4C_c4pmiYAkrXKpOjAORZUt8cYY (28. X 2019).
Lotman, Juri 1992. Semiosfäärist. – Akadeemia, nr 10, lk 2019-2042.
Lotman, Juri 2006. Kultuurisemiootika. Tekst-kirjandus-kultuur. Tlk Pärt Lias, Inta Soms, Rein Veidemann. Tallinn: Olion.
Matthews, Kelly E.; Andrews, Tori; Adams, Peter 2011. Social learning spaces and student engagement. – Education Research & Development, kd 30, nr 2, lk 105-120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.512629
Mol, Susan 2004. Head and heart: Metaphors and metonymies in a cross-linguistic perspective. – Translation and Corpora. Toim Karin Aijmer, Hilde Hasselgård. Selected Papers from the Göteborg-Oslo Symposium 18-19 October 2003. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, lk 87-111.
Murel, Liisa 2018. Mõtlema kutsuv kool. – Sirp 1. VI.
Oblinger, Diana G. 2006. Space as a change agent. – Learning Spaces. Toim D. ­Oblinger. Educause e-raamat, lk 1.1-1.4. https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7102.Pdf?fbclid=IwAR3nwpX_za25SFPDgU61JPdRUOwiKEhS4C_c4pmiYAkrXKpOjAORZUt8cYY (28. X 2019).
Piekkari, Jouni 2005. Drama – a Way to Social Inclusion. Practical Process Descriptions for Drama Workers. University of Turku: Centre for Extensions Studies.
Põlda, Halliki 2018. Andekusfenomeni konstrueerimine avalikus kommunikatsioonis. (Tallinna Ülikooli humanitaarteaduste dissertatsioonid 48.) Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Remm, Tiit 2017. Mõisaruumi ümbertähendamisest. – Acta Semiotica Estica, kd XIV, lk 117-131.
Saar, Ellu; Tamm, Auni; Roosalu, Triin; Roosmaa, Eve-Liis 2012. Mittetraditsiooniline tudeng kõrgkoolis. Uuringu “Õppija 2.0. Elukestev õpe kõrgkoolis: õpiprotsessi toetav keskkond” lõpparuanne. SA Archimedes.
Salter, Diane; Thomson, David L.; Fox, Bob; Lam, Joy 2013. Use and evaluation of a technology-rich experimental collaborative classroom. – Higher Education Research & Development, kd 32, nr 5, lk 805-819.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.777033
Scanlan, Judith; Care, Dean; Udod, Sonia 2002. Unravelling the unknown of reflection in classroom teaching. – Journal of Advanced Nursing, kd 38, nr 2, lk 136-143.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02157.x
Schechner, Richard; Chatterjee, Sudipto; Boal, Augusto 1998. Augusto Boal, city councillor: Legislative theatre and the chamber in the streets: An interview. – The Drama Review, kd 42, nr 4, lk 75-90.
https://doi.org/10.1162/105420498760308364
Sfard, Anna 2014. Metaphors in education. – Educational Theories, Cultures and Learning. A Critical Perspective. Toim Harry Daniels, Hugh Lauder, Jill Porter. London-New York: Routledge, lk 39-50.
Smith, Calvin; Bath, Debra 2006. The role of the learning community in the development of discipline knowledge and generic graduate outcomes. – Higher Education, kd 51, nr 2, lk 259-286.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6389-2
Tenjes, Silvi 2006. Ruumilise keele mehhanismid ja võimalused mõiste KÄSI väljendamisel. – Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, nr 2, lk 277-284.
https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa2.18
Thomas, Herbert 2010. Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis’placement’ of learning. – British Journal of Educational Technology, kd 41, nr 3, lk 502-511.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00974.x
Usher, Robi 2002. Putting space back on the map: Globalisation, place and identity. – Educational Philosophy and Theory, kd 34, nr 1, lk 41-55.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2002.tb00285.x
Veismann, Ann; Tragel, Ilona 2008. Kuidas horisontaalne ja vertikaalne liikumissuund eesti keeles aspektiks kehastuvad? – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 7, lk 515-530.
Vernik-Tuubel, Ene-Mall 2019. Individuaalsed õpiteed, õmblusteta õpikeskkond ja muu­seumipedagoogika. – Muuseum, kd 43, nr 2. https://ajakiri.muuseum.ee/individuaalsed-opiteed-omblusteta-opikeskkond-ja-muuseumipedagoogika/ (28. I 2020).
Österlind, Eva 2008. Acting out habits – can Theatre of the Oppressed promote change? Boal’s theatre methods in relation to Bordieu’s concept of habitus. – Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, kd 13, nr 1, lk 71-82.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780701825328