Search
|
ee

From digital humanities to cultural data analytics

https://doi.org/10.54013/kk764a2

Keywords: cultural data analytics, cultural analytics, digital humanities, complexity, semiosphere, cultural semiotics, cultural science

Digital Humanities (DH) has been a success story in the academic world over the last twenty years which has opened many new vistas in the humanities research. However, we argue that it is better to consider DH as a transitory phenomenon that needs to be developed into more specific research fields in order to overcome some fundamental shortcomings of DH. First, it is vital to transcend the division between qualitative inquiry into ideographic phenomena and quantification of nomothetic phenomena. This specifically includes the emergence and analysis of organized complexity, which emerges right in between. Secondly, it is important to surpass the dichotomy of singular and general as research objects and replace this by the notion of semiosphere as a research object, defined as the “smallest” functioning element of culture by Juri Lotman. From this perspective, the singular cultural unit is always conditioned by the whole of the semiosphere, but the whole can be always changed by the singular unit. Thirdly, the denominator “digital” is questionable and needs to be left behind, as there are many other forms of computation, which can be analog and/or digital. Indeed, alternative forms of non-digital computation are already seeing a comeback. Fourthly, the label of “humanities” is at the same time too large and too restrictive. We would argue for a more specific study of meaning making practices in human society, yet without confining ourselves to traditional humanities scholarship but learning from the new developments in system biology, evolutionary economics, complexity science and many more. We propose to call this new transdisciplinary field of study “cultural data analytics”, aiming to explore the dynamics of meaning making practices by computational means and looking at a spectrum of materials (textual, sonic, visual, multimodal, etc.) both regarding the longue durée and in real time, if not anticipating the future.

 

Indrek Ibrus (b. 1974), PhD, Tallinn University, Baltic Film, Media, and Arts School, Professor of Media Innovation (Narva mnt 27, 10120 Tallinn), indrek.ibrus@tlu.ee

Maximilian Schich (b. 1974), PhD, Tallinn University, Baltic Film, Media, and Arts School, Research Professor of Cultural Data Analytics (ERA Chair) (Narva mnt 27, 10120 Tallinn), mxs@tlu.ee

Marek Tamm (b. 1973), PhD, Tallinn University, School of Humanities, Professor of Cultural History (Narva mnt 29, 10120 Tallinn), marek.tamm@tlu.ee

References

Veebivarad

Complexity Explained. Manlio De Domenico, D. Brockmann, C. Camargo, C. Gershenson, D. Goldsmith, S. Jeschonnek, L. Kay, S. Nichele, J. R. Nicolás, T. Schmickl, M. Stella, J. Brandoff, A. J. Martínez Salinas, H. Sayama. 27. VI 2019. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TQGNW

Cudan Open Lab. https://cudan.tlu.ee

Eesti 3D kaksiku uuring. https://eehitus.ee/timeline-post/3d-kaksiku-uuring

What is Digital Humanities? https://whatisdigitalhumanities.com

Kirjandus

Ahnert, Ruth; Ahnert, Sebastian E.; Coleman, Catherine Nicole; Weingart, Scott B. 2021. The Network Turn: Changing Perspectives in the Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866804
Anderson, Philip W. 1972. More is different. – Science, kd 177, nr 4047, lk 393-396.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.177.4047.393
Balkun, Mary McAleer; Deyrup, Marta Mestrovic (toim) 2020. Transformative Digital Humanities: Challenges and Opportunities. London-New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429399923
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429399923
Barabási, Albert-László 2016. Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barthelemy, Marc 2019. The statistical physics of cities. – Nature Reviews Physics, kd 1, nr 6, lk 406-415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0054-2
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0054-2
Benington, John; Moore, Mark H. 2011. Public Value: Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36431-8
Berry, David M. 2014. Critical Theory and the Digital. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Berry, David M.; Fagerjord, Anders 2017. Digital Humanities: Knowledge and Critique in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Bertalanffy, Ludwig von 1951. General system theory: A new approach to unity of science. – Human Biology, kd 23, nr 4, lk 302-312.
Bod, Rens 2014. A New History of the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cassirer, Ernst 2000 [1910]. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. – E. Cassirer, Gesammelte Werke. Toim Birgit Recki. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Coleman, Catherine Nicole 2020. Managing bias when library collections become data. – International Journal of Librarianship, kd 5, nr 1, lk 8-19.
https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2020.vol5.1.162
Couldry, Nick; Mejias, Ulises A. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating for Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
Dencik, Lina; Hintz, Arne; Redden, Joanna; Treré, Emiliano 2019. Exploring data justice: Conceptions, applications and directions. – Information, Communication & Society, kd 22, nr 7, lk 873-881.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268
Dilthey, Wilhelm 1959 [1883]. Gesammelte Schriften. Kd 1. Stuttgart: Teubner.
Dilthey, Wilhelm 1997. Ajaloolise maailma ülesehitus vaimuteadustes. – Filosoofilise hermeneutika klassikat. (Avatud Eesti raamat.) Tlk Andrus Tool. Tartu: Ilmamaa, lk 72-83.
Eco, Umberto 1977. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Engelbrecht, Jüri; Kitt, Robert 2020. Komplekssüsteemid ehk Tervik on suurem kui osade summa. Tallinn: Postimees Kirjastus.
Erlin, Matt; Piper, Andrew; Knox, Douglas; Pentecost, Stephen; Drouillard, Michaela; Powell, Brian; Townson, Cienna 2021. Cultural capitals: Modeling ‘Minor’ European ­literature. – Journal of Cultural Analytics, nr 2, lk 40-73.
https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.21182
Fischer, Ronald; Poortinga, Ype H. 2018. Addressing methodological challenges in culture-comparative research. – Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, kd 49, nr 5, lk 691-712.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117738086
Gold, Matthew K. (toim) 2012. Debates in the Digital Humanities. London-Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gold, Matthew K.; Klein, Lauren F. (toim) 2016. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. London-Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gold, Matthew K.; Klein, Lauren F. (toim) 2019. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019. London-Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hartley, John 2009. From Cultural Studies to Cultural Science. – Cultural Science, kd 2, nr 1, lk 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.18
Hartley, John 2020. How We Use Stories and Why That Matters: Cultural Science in Action. New York: Bloomsbury.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501351662
Hartley, John; Ibrus, Indrek; Ojamaa, Maarja 2021a. On the Digital Semiosphere: Culture, Media and Science for the Anthropocene. London: Bloomsbury.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501369209
Hartley, John; Ibrus, Indrek; Ojamaa, Maarja 2021b. Emergent self-mediating classes in the digital semiosphere: Coronavirus conspiracies and climate justice movement. – Nordic Journal of Cultural Studies, kd 3, nr 1, lk 118-140.
https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2021-0007
Hartley, John; Potts, Jason 2014. Cultural Science: A Natural History of Stories, Demes, Knowledge and Innovation. London: Bloomsbury.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849666053
Heeks, Richard; Shekhar, Satyarupa 2019. Datafication, development and marginalised urban communities: An applied data justice framework. – Information, Communication & Society, kd 22, nr 7, lk 992-1011.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1599039
Hexter, Jack H. 1972. Fernand Braudel and the Monde Braudellien… – Journal of Modern History, kd 44, nr 4, lk 480-539.
https://doi.org/10.1086/240839
Huxley, T. 1869. Nature: Aphorisms by Goethe. – Nature, kd 1, lk 9-11.
https://doi.org/10.1038/001009a0
Ibrus, Indrek; Ojamaa, Maarja 2018. Newsreels versus newspapers versus metadata: A comparative study of metadata modelling the 1930s in Estonia. – VIEW: Journal of European Television History and Culture, kd 7, nr 14, lk 123-137.
https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2018.jethc157
Ibrus, Indrek; Ojamaa, Maarja 2020. The creativity of digital (audiovisual) archives: A dialogue between media archaeology and cultural semiotics. – Theory, Culture & Society, kd 37, nr 3, lk 49-70.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419871646
Isaak, Jim; Hanna, Mina J. 2018. User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. – Computer, kd 51, nr 8, lk 56-59.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3191268
Jacobs, Jane 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
Jones, Steven E. 2014. The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. London-New York: Routledge.
Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2012. Digital humanities as/is a tactical turn. – Debates in the Digital Humanities. Toim Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, lk 415-428.
https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0043
Kittler, Friedrich A. 1994. Wenn die Freiheit wirklich existiert, dann soll sie doch ausbrechen. – Am Ende vorbei. Toim Rudolf Maresch. Wien: Turia & Kant, lk 95-129.
Kull, Kalevi 1998. On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere. – Semiotica, kd 120, nr 3-4, lk 299-310.
Kull, Kalevi; Lotman, Mihhail 1995. Semiotica Tartuensis: Jakob von Uexküll ja Juri Lotman. – Akadeemia, nr 12, lk 2467-2483.
Kull, Kalevi; Lotman, Mihhail 2012. Semiotica Tartuensis: Jakob von Uexküll and Juri Lotman. – Chinese Semiotic Studies, kd 6, nr 1, lk 312-323.
https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2012-0122
Lee, Minjin; Barbosa, Hugo; Youn, Hyejin; Holme, Petter; Ghoshal, Gourab 2017. Morphology of travel routes and the organization of cities. – Nature Communications, kd 8, nr 1, lk 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02374-7
Mandelbrot, Benoit 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Kd 1. New York: WH Freeman.
Manovich, Lev 2020. Cultural Analytics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11214.001.0001
Mazzucato, Mariana 2018. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. London: Allen Lane.
Milan, Stefania; Treré, Emiliano 2019. Big Data from the South(s): Beyond data universalism. – Television & New Media, kd 20, nr 4, lk 319-335.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
Mitchell, Melanie 2009. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perez, Caroline Criado 2019. Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. London: Chatto & Windus.
Pressner, Todd; Schnapp, Jeffrey 2009. The Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0. http://manifesto.humanities.ucla.edu/2009/05/29/the-digital-humanities-manifesto-20
Prigogine, Ilya; Stengers, Isabelle 2018 [1984]. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. London: Verso Books.
Ravenstein, Ernest George 1885. The laws of migration. – Journal of the Statistical Society of London, kd 48, nr 2, lk 167-235.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2979181
Riedl, Rupert 2000. Strukturen der Komplexität: Eine Morphologie des Erkennens und ­Erklärens. Berlin: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56946-3
Schich, Maximilian 2016. Figuring out art history. – International Journal for Digital Art History, nr 2, lk 41-67.
Schich, Maximilian 2019. Cultural Analysis Situs. ART-Dok eprint.
Schich, Maximilian; Song, Chaoming; Ahn, Yong-Yeol; Mirsky, Alexander; Martino, Mauro; Barabási, Albert-László; Helbing, Dirk 2014. A network framework of cultural history. – Science, kd 345, nr 6196, lk 558-562.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240064
Schich, Maximilian; Meirelles, Isabel; Malina, Roger (toim) 2016. Arts, Humanities, and Complex Networks. 5. vlj [Kindle Edition]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_e_01334
Schreibman, Susan; Siemens, Ray; Unsworth, John (toim) 2004. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Malden, MA-Oxford: Blackwell.
https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405103213.2004.00002.x
Schreibman, Susan; Siemens, Ray; Unsworth, John (toim) 2016. A New Companion to Digital Humanities. Malden, MA-Oxford: Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605
Shuttleworth, Alan 1966. Two Working Papers in Cultural Studies – A Humane Culture and Max Weber and the “Cultural Sciences”. Birmingham: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.
Smithies, James 2017. The Digital Humanities and the Digital Modern. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49944-8
Snow, Charles Percy 2017 [1961]. Kaks kultuuri ja teadusrevolutsioon. – C. P. Snow, Kaks kultuuri ja teadusrevolutsioon. Jerome Kagan, Kolm kultuuri. Loodusteadused, sotsiaalteadused ja humanitaarteadused 21. sajandil. (Avatud Eesti raamat.) Tlk Mart Trummal. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 11-56.
Svensson, Patrik 2012. Beyond the Big Tent. – Debates in the Digital Humanities. Toim ­Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, lk 36-49.
https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0004
Zinoviev, Dmitry 2016. The pain of complexity. – Leonardo, kd 49, nr 5, lk 450.
https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01271
Tamm, Marek; Kull, Kalevi 2016. Toward a reterritorialisation of cultural theory: Estonian theory from Baer via Uexküll to Lotman. – History of the Human Sciences, kd 29, nr 1, lk 75−98.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695115617407
Tamm, Marek; Torop, Peeter (toim) (ilmumas). The Companion to Juri Lotman: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: Bloomsbury.
Terras, Melissa; Nyhan, Julianne; Vanhoutte, Edward (toim) 2013. Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader. Farnham: Ashgate.
Torop, Peeter 2008. Translation as communication and auto-communication. – Sign Systems Studies, kd 36, nr 2, lk 375-397.
https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2008.36.2.06
Torop, Peeter 2015. Kultuuriteooria kui kultuuri eneseteadvus. – Akadeemia, nr 4, lk 626-649.
Uexküll Jakob von 1909. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: J. Springer.
Uexküll, Jakob von 2012. Omailmad. (Eesti mõttelugu 105.) Koost Kalevi Kull, Riin Magnus. Tlk Mari Tarvas, Krista Räni. Tartu: Ilmamaa.
Weaver, Warren 1948. Science and complexity. – American Scientist, kd 36, lk 536-567.
Weingart, Scott B.; Eichmann-Kalwara, Nickoal 2017. What’s under the Big Tent?: A study of ADHO conference abstracts. – Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, kd 7, nr 1.
https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.284
Williams, Raymond 1974. Communications as cultural science. – Journal of Communication, kd 24, nr 3, lk 17-26.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00385.x
Windelband, Wilhelm 1993 [1894]. Ajalugu ja loodusteadus. Tlk Marju Luts. – Akadeemia, nr 3, lk 490-505.
Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey 2000. Silicon sociology, or, Two kings on Hegel’s throne? Kittler, Luhmann, and posthuman merger of German media theory. – The Yale Journal of Criticism, kd 13, nr 2, lk 391-420.
https://doi.org/10.1353/yale.2000.0027