Motion verbs along the horizontal and vertical axes

A sorting experiment

Keywords: verb meaning, motion verbs, classification, experimental semantics

In this paper, the meaning of motion verbs is analysed by means of a sorting task. The aim of the study was to identify the degree to which motion verbs in Estonian express horizontal and/or vertical motion. For that, 95 frequent motion verbs of Estonian were presented one by one to 39 native-speaking participants. Their task was to classify the verbs into one of the four pre-defined categories: ‘upward motion’, ‘horizontal motion’, ‘downward motion’, ‘don’t know’. Multidimensional scaling and a clustering technique were then used for statistical data analysis. The results show four main clusters of the verbs: 1) verbs of downward motion (e.g., kukkuma ‘fall’ and sukelduma ‘dive’); 2) verbs of upward motion (e.g., tõusma ‘rise’ and ronima ‘climb’); 3) verbs of horizontal motion (e.g., ujuma ‘swim’ and kõndima ‘walk’); 4) verbs of ambiguous meaning (e.g., rühkima ‘forge, plod’ and kiikuma ‘swing’). In each of the categories, some verbs are more prototypical than the others. Furthermore, the categories blend into each other, indicating that their boundaries are somewhat fuzzy. An in-depth analysis of the classifying choices indicates that when deciding upon the meaning of an isolated word, a speaker may use various strategies. Given that motion verbs are well known for their semantic complexity, the study also shows that a classification based on just one semantic feature is not only possible, but also enables the classification to be more transparent.


Piia Taremaa (b. 1982), PhD, University of Tartu, Institute of Estonian and ­General ­Linguistics, Research Fellow in General Linguistics (Jakobi 2-446, 51005 Tartu),



DataDOI. Artikli andmekogum ja lisamaterjalid.
R Core Team 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Aske, Jon 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. – Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, kd 15, lk 1-14.
Cardini, Filippo-Enrico 2008. Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. – Cognitive Linguistics, kd 19, nr 4, lk 533-569.
Cardini, Filippo-Enrico 2012. Grammatical constraints and verb-framed languages: The case of Italian. – Language & Cognition, kd 4, nr 3, lk 167-201.
Cifuentes Férez, Paula 2010. The semantics of the English and the Spanish motion verb lexicons. – Review of Cognitive Linguistics, kd 8, nr 2, lk 233-271.
Freeman, Jonathan B.; Ambady, Nalini 2010. MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. – Behavior Research Methods, kd 42, nr 1, lk 226-241.
Gibbs Jr, Raymond W. 2006. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, Adele 2010. Verbs, constructions and semantic frames. – Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure. Toim Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron, Ivy Sichel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, lk 39-58.
Goschler, Juliana; Stefanowitsch, Anatol (toim) 2013. Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events. (Human Cognitive Processing 41.) Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gottwald, Janna M.; Elsner, Birgit; Pollatos, Olga 2015. Good is up: spatial metaphors in action observation. – Frontiers in Psychology, kd 6, lk 1605.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide 2009. Path salience in motion events. – Crosslinguistic Ap­proaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. Toim Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura jt. New York-London: Psychology Press, lk 403-414.
Kipper Schuler, Karin 2005. VerbNet: A Broad-Coverage, Comprehensive Verb Lexicon. A Dissertation in Computer and Information Science. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.
Kopecka, Anetta 2010. Motion events in Polish: Lexicalization patterns and the description of Manner. – New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion. (Studies in Language Companion Series 115.) Toim Viktoria Hasko, Renee Perelmutter. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, lk 225-246.
Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakusta, Laura; Landau, Barbara 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. – Cognition, kd 96, nr 1, lk 1-33.
Lenci, Alessandro 2014. Carving Verb Classes from Corpora. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332.) Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Levin, Beth 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth; Rappaport Hovav, Malka 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result com­plementarity. – Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates. (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 93.) Toim Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke, Rafael Marín. Dordrecht: Springer, lk 49-70.
Nelis, Liis; Miljan, Merilin 2016. Acquisition of motion in L2 Estonian. – Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, nr 12, lk 161-185.
Pajunen, Anneli 2001. Argumenttirakenne. Asian tilojen luokitus ja verbien käyttäytyminen suomen kielessä. Jyväskylä: Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy.
Pajusalu, Renate; Kahusk, Neeme; Orav, Heili; Veismann, Ann; Vider, Kadri; Õim, Haldur 2013. The encoding of motion events in Estonian. – Motion Encoding in Language and Space. (Explorations in Language and Space 6.) Toim Emile van der Zee, Mila Vulchanova. Oxford: Oxford University Press, lk 44-66.
Papafragou, Anna; Hulbert, Justin; Trueswell, John 2008. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. – Cognition, kd 108, nr 1, lk 155-184.
Pool, Raili; Pajusalu, Renate 2012. Liikumissündmused eesti keele õppijate kirjalikes narratiivides. – ESUKA/JEFUL, kd 3, nr 2, lk 153-182.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka; Levin, Beth 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. – Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 27.) Toim Edit Doron, M. Rappaport Hovav, Ivy Sichel. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, lk 21-38.
Slobin, Dan I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. – Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, kd 17, lk 70-96.
Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. – Relating Events in Narrative. Kd 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Toim Sven Strömqvist, Ludo Verhoeven. Mahwah, NJ-London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, lk 219-257.
Slobin, Dan I.; Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide; Kopecka, Anetta; Majid, Asifa 2014. Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. – Cognitive Linguistics, kd 25, nr 4, lk 701-741.
Talmy, Leonard 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. – Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Kd 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Toim Timothy Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 57-149.
Talmy, Leonard 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Kd 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA-London: The MIT Press.
Taremaa, Piia 2017. Attention Meets Language: A Corpus Study on the Expression of Motion in Estonian. (Dissertationes linguisticae Universitas Tartuensis 29.) Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
Tragel, Ilona; Taremaa, Piia 2019. Eesti keele verbide semantilisest liigitamisest. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 3, lk 207-222.
Tragel, Ilona; Veismann, Ann 2008. Kuidas horisontaalne ja vertikaalne liikumissuund eesti keeles aspektiks kehastuvad? – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 7, lk 515-530.