What is poetry? II



The present attempt to answer the question, What is poetry? has (a) delivered a minimal definition, (b) supplemented it with some prototypical features, and (c) called for historical articulation of the resulting complex. The first part of the essay reached an external and formal definition: a poem is a short text in verse. Following Werner Wolf’s attempt to distil prototypical features from a variety of earlier definitions, we concluded that besides textuality, brevity and verse, the characteristic features of lyric include a possibility of oral performance, deviation from everyday usage, a presence of unmediated consciousness, a subjective perspective, a foregrounding of the acoustic potential of verbal signifiers, a heightened self-referentiality and self-reflexivity, a relative lack of external action, absoluteness, and untranslatability. Although these features need not present themselves in each and every poem and they have many instances outside poetry, a prototypical poem – prototype being a mental construct for recognizing and classifying a given text as a poem – displays most of them. A possible prototypical poem may make some normative claims, even though deviations from the prototype may turn out to be aesthetically valuable as well. Addition of more evaluative features would result in a canonical poem. Poetry canons from various periods co-exist simultaneously in a given period as if revealed in a geological outcrop. Yet the canon is a cumulative and irreversible series rather than a synchronic simultaneous agglomerate, although the sense of the historicity of the canon seems to be receding. It is hoped that the prototypical features listed would enable an empirical specification and study of canons inhabiting Estonian culture at a given time.


Alttoa, Villem 1958 = “Edasi” ankeet [kirjanike kongressi eel]. V. Alttoa vastused. – Edasi 19. X.


Auden, W. H. 2012. 39 luuletust ja 5 esseed. Tlk Märt Väljataga. – Loomingu Raamatukogu, nr 3-6. Tallinn: SA Kultuurileht.


Avaliku Sõna Nõukogu otsus nr 24, 8. III 1993.


Beardsley, Monroe 1981. Fiction as representation. – Synthese, kd 46, nr 3, lk 291-313.


Bernstein, Boriss 1990. Kunstiteadus ja -tüpoloogia. – Boriss Bernštein, Kunstiteadus ja kunstikultuur. Tallinn: Kunst, lk 62-85.


Bernstein, Boriss 1994. Raam ja koondumispunkt. Tlk J. Ojamaa. – Vikerkaar, nr 9, lk 48-57.


Bornhöhe, Eduard 1962 [1892]. Kuulsuse narrid. – Eduard Bornhöhe, Tallinna jutud. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, lk 65-89.


Culler, Jonathan 1975. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.


Culler, Jonathan 1981 [1977]. Apostrophe. – Jonathan Culler, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, lk 135-154.


Culler, Jonathan 2001. Comparing poetry (2001 ACLA Presidential Address). – Comparative Literature, kd 53, nr 3, suvi 2001, lk vii-xviii.


Eskin, Michael 2000. Bakhtin on Poetry. – Poetics Today, kd 21, nr 2, suvi 2000, lk 379-391.


Fish, Stanley 1980. How to recognize a poem when you see one. – Stanley Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, lk 303-321.


Friedrich, Hugo 1974 [1956]. The Structure of Modern Poetry: From the Mid-Nineteenth Century to the Mid-Twentieth Century. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.


Frye, Northrop 1985. Approaching the lyric. – Chaviva Hošek, Patricia Parker (toim), Lyric Poetry: Beyond New Criticism. Ithaca-London: Cornell University Press, lk 31-37.


Genette, Gérard 1993. Fiction & Diction. Ithaka: Cornell University Press.


Hamburger, Käte 1993 [1957]. The Logic of Fiction. 2nd, revised edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.


Hennoste, Tiit 2003 [1997]. Kaanon, kaanan. – Tiit Hennoste, Eurooplaseks saamine. Kõrvalkäija altkulmupilk. Artikleid ja arvamusi 1986-2003. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 178-188.


Herrnstein-Smith, Barbara 1971. Poetry as fiction. – New Literary History, kd II, nr 2, lk 259-281.


Ilmet, Peep 2009. Luuletu luule. – Looming, nr 5, lk 718-720.


Jakobson, Roman 2012 [1958]. Lingvistika ja poeetika. Tlk Neeme Lopp ja Arne Merilai. – Akadeemia, nr 10, lk 1731-1773.


Jeffreys, Mark 1995. Ideologies of lyric: a problem of genre in contemporary anglophone poetics. – PMLA, kd 110, nr 2, märts 1995, lk 196-205.


Johnson, W. R. 1982. The Idea of Lyric. Lyric Modes in Ancient and Modern Poetry. Berkeley-London: University of California Press.


Juhtkiri: Eeskujuks kõigile. Postimees 9. I 2009.


Langemets, Andres 1998. Aastasaja parimad eesti luuletajad. – Luup, nr 25 (82), 14. XII.


Lotman, Maria-Kristiina, Lotman, Mihhail, Lotman, Rebekka 2007. Autometakirjeldus eesti luules I. – Acta Semiotica Estica V, lk 11-34.


Mellmann, Katja 2013. Evolutionary proto-forms of literary behavior. – Wulf Schiefenhövel jt (toim), Ethology and the Arts (Hanse-Studien). Oldenburg: BIS (ilmumas).


Morgenstern, Christian 1998. Kala öölaul. Tlk Udo Uibo. – Looming, nr 2, lk 217.


Mäger, Mart 1979 [1973]. Luule ja proosa. – Mart Mäger, Luule ja lugeja. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, lk 7-34.


Müller-Zettelmann, Eva, Rubik, Margarete (toim) 2005. Theory Into Poetry: New Approaches to the Lyric. New York-Amsterdam: Rodopi.


Pavel, Thomas 2003. Romaani mõtlemine. Tlk Katre Talviste. – Vikerkaar, nr 7-8, lk 112-136.


Poe, Edgar Allan 2001 [1846]. Philosophy of composition. – Vincent Leitch (toim), The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York: Norton & Company, lk 742-750.


Rummo, Paul-Eerik 1999. Luuletused. Tallinn: Kupar.


Ryan, Marie-Laure 1981. Introduction: On the why, what and how of generic taxonomy. – Poetics, kd 10, lk 109-126.


Ryan, Marie-Laure 2010. Fiction, cognition, and non-narrative media. – Marina Grishakova, Marie-Laure Ryan (toim). Intermediality and Storytelling. Berlin- New York: De Gruyter, lk 8-26.


Sang, Joel 1987 [1981]. Kriitiku pihtimused. – Joel Sang, Päripidi vastukarva: Kirjatöid aastaist 1976-1986. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, lk 24-29.


Schmid, Wolf 2013. Poetic or ornamental prose. – Hühn, Peter jt (toim), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/index.php?title=Poetic or Ornamental Prose&oldid=1993 (26. III 2013).


Smith, J. Mark 2007. Apostrophe, or the lyric art of turning away. – Texas Studies in Literature and Language, kd 49, nr 4, lk 411-437.


Staiger, Emil 1991 [1946]. Basic Concepts of Poetics. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.


Šklovski 1983 [1919] = Шкловский, В. Б., Связь приемов сюжетосложения с общими приемами стиля. – В. Б. Шкловский, О теории прозы. Москва: Советский писатель, lk 26-62.


Zipfel, Frank 2001. Fiktion, Fiktivität, Fiktionalität: Analysen zur Fiktion in der Literatur und zum Fiktionsbegriff in der Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.


Zymner, Rüdiger 2009. Lyrik. Umriss und Begriff. Paderborn: Mentis.


Terras, Victor 2010 [1970]. Poeetiline vorm ja keelestruktuur eesti luules. Tlk M. Väljataga. – Vikerkaar, nr 4-5, lk 151-155.


Top 100 Eesti luuletused 2011.


Tõnjanov, Juri, Jakobson, Roman 2012. Kirjanduse ja keele uurimise probleemid. Tlk M. Väljataga. – Vikerkaar, nr 3, lk 52.


Urmet, Jaak 2011. See, kuidas eesti näitlejad luulet loevad, on jube! – Eesti Ekspress 25. IV.


Wolf, Werner 2005. The lyric: Problems of definition and a proposal for reconceptualisation. – Eva Müller-Zettelmann, Margarete Rubik (toim), Theory into Poetry: New Approaches to the Lyric. Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi, lk 21-56.


Wypijewski, Jo Ann (toim) 1997. Painting by Numbers: Komar and Melamid’s Scientific Guide to Art. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.