PDF

What is the role of mora in Estonian?

https://doi.org/10.54013/kk726a1

Keywords: phonology, Estonian quantity, moraic consonant, lenis, fortis, foot

The article introduces the main principles of moraic theory and the role of mora in Estonian phonology, also addressing the history of the concept ‘mora’ in theoretical linguistics. In traditional studies of metrics, the term ‘mora’ used to refer to a minimal unit of metrical time (equivalent to a short syllable). Yet according to moraic theory, mora is a unit of phonological structure, a part of the syllable, not just a measure of length. This approach allows to explain the ternary system of Estonian quantity as well as the distinction between syllable-final lenis and fortis obstruents in a straigthforward way, which is, moreover, in good accordance with phonetical facts. Fortis obstruents in Estonian are traditionally described as sequences of two identical consonants. This is problematic because phonetic analysis has detected no consistent rearticulation during fortis obstruents. Such a sequence of identical segments also violates the universal obligatory contour principle. In moraic theory, fortis can be defined as a moraic obstruent and lenis as a non-moraic obstruent. In moraic theory Estonian quantity degrees are described as follows: the stressed syllable of Q3 fills the whole foot, whereas in the case of Q1 and Q2 the foot consists of two syllables.

Külli Prillop (b. 1974), PhD, University of Tartu, Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, Research Fellow in Estonian Phonology, kulli.prillop@ut.ee

References

Allen, William Sidney 1987. Vox Graeca: The Pronunciation of Classical Greek. 3. tr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Asu, Eva Liina 2016. Eesti keele intonatsioon. – Eva Liina Asu, Pärtel Lippus, Karl Pajusalu, Pire Teras, Eesti keele hääldus. (Eesti keele varamu II.) Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 161–188.

Asu, Eva Liina, Teras, Pire 2009. Illustrations of the IPA: Estonian. – Journal of the International Phonetic Association, kd 39, nr 3, lk 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510030999017X

Bloomfield, Leonard 1935. Language. London: Georg Allen and Unwin.

Broselow, Ellen, Chen, Su-I, Huffman, Marie 1997. Syllable weight: convergence of phonology and phonetics. – Phonology, kd 14, nr 1, lk 47–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267579700331X

Bye, Patrik 1997. A generative perspective on ‘overlength’ in Estonian and Saa­mi. – Estonian Prosody: Papers from a Symposium. Toim Ilse Lehiste, Jaan Ross. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language, lk 36–70.

Chomsky, Noam, Halle, Morris 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

Crosswhite, Katherine 2004. Vowel reduction. – Phonetically Based Phonology. Toim B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, D. Steriade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 191–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486401.007

Eek, Arvo, Help, Toomas 1986. Rütminihked eesti keele kujunemisloos. Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia.

Eek, Arvo, Meister, Einar 2004. Foneetilisi katseid ja arutlusi kvantiteedi alalt. Takt, silp ja välde. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 4, lk 251–271; nr 5, lk 336–357.

Ehala, Martin 1999. Eesti väldete probleemi üks lahendusi. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 6, lk 378–386; nr 7, lk 453–466.

Ehala, Martin 2003. Estonian quantity: Implications for moraic theory. – Generative Approaches to Finnic and Saami Linguistics. Toim D. C. Nelson, S. Manninen. Stanford: CSLI Publications, lk 51–80.

Fox, Anthony 2000. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fudge, Eric C. 1969. Syllables. – Journal of Linguistics, kd 5, nr 2, lk 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700002267

Hallap, Valmen 1963. Fonoloogiline etüüd eesti keele väldete alalt. – Nonaginta. (Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Emakeele Seltsi Toimetised 6.) Tallinn, lk 95–122.

Hayes, Bruce 1981. A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. PhD dissertation [käsikiri]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Hayes, Bruce 1989. Compensatory lengthening on moraic phonology. – Linguistic Inquiry, kd 20, nr 2, lk 253–306.

Hayes, Bruce 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.

Hermann, Gottfried 1799. Handbuch der Metrik. Leipzig: bey Gerhard Fleischer dem Jüngern.

Hint, Mati 1997. Eesti keele astmevahelduse ja prosoodiasüsteemi tüpoloogilised probleemid. Tallinn–Helsinki: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.

Hock, Hans-Henrich 1986. Compensatory lengthening: In defense of the concept „mora”. – Folia Linguistica, kd 20, nr 3–4, lk 431–460. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1986.20.3-4.431

Hyman, Larry M. 1985. A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854794

Hyman, Larry M. 2008. Universals in phonology. – The Linguistic Review, kd 25, nr 1–2, lk 83–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.003

Itō, Junko, Mester, Armin 2003. Japanese Morphophonemics: Markedness and Word Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4014.001.0001

Kager, René, Martínez-Pariciolt, Violeta 2018. The internally layered foot in Dutch. – Linguistics, kd 56, nr 1, lk 69–114. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0037

Kavitskaya, Darya 2002. Triggers and alternations in compensatory lengthening. – Proceedings of the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Toim L. Mikkelsen, C. Potts. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, lk 101–114.

Kiparsky, Paul 2003. Syllables and moras in Arabic. – Syllable in Optimality Theory. Toim C. Fery, R. van de Vijver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497926.007

Kiparsky, Paul 2017. Livonian stød. – Segmental Structure and Tone. Toim W. Kehrein, B. Köhnlein, P. Boersma, M. Oostendorp. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter, lk 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110341263-007

Köhnlein, Björn 2016. Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone-accent dialects. – Phonology, kd 33, nr 1, lk 87–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267571600004X

Lacy, Paul de 2007. Themes in phonology. – The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Toim P. de Lacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 5–30.

Lehiste, Ilse 1960. Segmental and syllabic quantity in Estonian. – American Studies in Uralic Linguistics I. Bloomington: Indiana University, lk 21–82.

Lehiste, Ilse 1997. Search for phonetic correlates in Estonian prosody. – Estonian Prosody: Papers from a Symposium. Toim Ilse Lehiste, Jaan Ross. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language, lk 11–35.

Lippus, Pärtel 2016. Eesti keele sõnaprosoodia. – Eva Liina Asu, Pärtel Lippus, Karl Pajusalu, Pire Teras, Eesti keele hääldus. (Eesti keele varamu II.) Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 119–160.

McCarthy, John 1979. On stress and syllabification. – Linguistic Inquiry, kd 10, nr 3, lk 443–466.

McCarthy, John J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. – Linguistic Inquiry, kd 17, nr 2, lk 207–263.

Morén-Duolljá, Bruce 2013. The prosody of Swedish underived nouns: No lexical tones required. – Nordlyd, kd 40, nr 1, lk 196–248. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2506

Nespor, Marina, Vogel, Irene 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

Piits, Liisi, Kalvik, Mari-Liis 2017. Varieeruva vältega sõnade hääldusuuringud kõnesünteesi teenistuses. – Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aasta­raamat, kd 13, lk 123–140. https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa13.08

Pike, Kenneth L., Pike, Eunice V. 1947. Immediate constituents of Mazateco syllables. – International Journal of American Linguistics, kd 13, nr 2, lk 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/463932

Prince, Alan 1980. A metrical theory of Estonian quantity. – Linguistic Inquiry, kd 11, nr 3, lk 511–562.

Prillop, Külli 2013. Feet, syllables, moras and the Estonian quantity system. – Linguistica Uralica, kd 49, nr 1, lk 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2013.1.01

Prillop, Külli 2015. Hääliku-, silbi- ning jalavälde: ühe nähtuse mitu tahku. – Eesti ja Soome-Ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri, nr 6 (3), lk 169−195. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2015.6.3.07

Raun, Alo, Saareste, Andrus 1965. Introduction to Estonian Linguistics. (Ural-Altaische Bibliothek XII.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Suomi, Kari, Toivanen, Juhani, Ylitalo, Riikka 2008. Finnish Sound Structure. Phonetics, Phonology, Phonotactics and Prosody. Oulu: Oulu University Press.

Zec, Draga 2007. The syllable. – The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Toim P. de Lacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 161–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.009

Teras, Pire 2016. Eesti konsonandid. – Eva Liina Asu, Pärtel Lippus, Karl Pajusalu, Pire Teras, Eesti keele hääldus. (Eesti keele varamu II.) Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 63–117.

Trubetzkoy, Nikolai 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Prague: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

Türk, Helen, Lippus, Pärtel, Šimko, Juraj 2017. Context-dependent articulation of consonant gemination in Estonian. – Laboratory Phonology, kd 8, nr 1, lk 1−26. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.117

Vaux, Bert, Wolfe, Andrew 2009. The appendix. – Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonology. Toim E. Raimy, C. E. Cairns. Cambridge, MA–London: MIT Press, lk 101–143. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262182706.003.0005

Weske, M. 1879. Eesti keele healte õpetus ja kirjutuse viis. (Eesti kirjawara 1.) Tartu: Schnakenburg’i trükk ja kulu.

Yip, Moira 2007. Tone. – The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Toim P. de Lacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.011